Re: utf8 vs iso8859-1 speed/responsiveness

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 12:29, William Hooper wrote:
> Ow Mun Heng said:
> > On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 12:00, Hideki Hiura wrote:
> > 
> >>> From: Ow Mun Heng <Ow.Mun.Heng@xxxxxxx>
> >>> Anyone knows how to tweak this parameter to say iso8859-1 via a proc
> >>> or a sysconfig interface/file? Does the change actually make a
> >>> difference?
> >> 
> >> It probably depend on application...modern toolkits such as gtk+ use
> >> UTF-8 as internal encoding so changing external encoding from UTF-8 to
> >> iso8859-1 actually add extra step to convert UTF-8 to/from iso8859-1 upon
> >> I/O.
> >> 
> > Well... then tell me this..
> > 
> > 
> > how come FC2 seems(IS) slower compared to my original RH9 install. I was
> > using iso8859-1 then and utf8 now.
> 
> Different kernel version
> Different Gnome version
> Different KDE version
> Different compiler used
> etc., etc.
> 
> Tell me this:  Why is my apple slower than my original orange?  :-)
So.. we're going towards the bloated concept again?




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux