On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:43:41PM +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am Mo, den 28.06.2004 schrieb T. Nifty Hat Mitchell um 22:23: > > > How do you filter lame-server messages so you can discover > > problems with your own domain and toss those that are out > > of your control? > > > > My practice when I had responsibility of a large name space was to not .... > Your warning is correct and rereading my reply to Olga's question was in > the sense of your arguments a bit unresponsible. Of course lame server > notifications have their sense. You are too harsh on yourself ;-) The first response should address the big 80% of the issue, as you did. I am just adding additional thoughts that would complicate things in an initial reply. It is easy to build on a good start.... > logfile. A possible setup to do so would be in the named.conf: > > logging { > channel lamers { > file "/var/log/lamer.log" versions 4 size 1m; > severity info; > print-time yes; > print-category yes; > print-severity yes; > }; > category lame-servers { > lamers; > }; > }; > > Such a log can be quickly grepped for notifications caused by own > errors. I like this addition. It is what I do naturally when I grep my log files by hand. -v this and -i that.... quickly there is a good filter. -- T o m M i t c h e l l /dev/null the ultimate in secure storage.