On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 11:17, Satish Balay wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Ted Gervais wrote: > > > Has anyone thought of going back to RH9? That release had virtually no > > problems and while it was the last supported release it still is/was better > > than the fedora distributions. I am thinking of the problems with the sound, > > scanners, and other hardware devices and applications. I would have thought > > that after FC1 that FC2 would have had all the current concerns fixed and it > > would have been as good as RH9. Turns out, it is many steps behind the last > > RedHat release and makes one wonder about continuing. > > > > Anyway - just wondering if others have had the same thought about going back > > to what was better than the current FC2 release?? > > FC1 -> FC2 was a major change > > 2.4 kernel -> 2..6 kernel > OSS sound -> ALSA sound. > > If things don't work with FC2 to your satisfaction - stick arround > with FC1. FC1 is an improvement over RHL9 - in your terms. Yes. FC1 was an improvement over RH9, but FC2 was a disappointment. So rather than go back to RH9, just drop back to FC1. I wonder if that is possible?? > > Satish -- Ted Gervais Coldbrook, Nova Scotia Canada.
