melgil88@xxxxxxxxxxxxx said: > Sure, I can do that. I don't know about the signature thing though; some > people might be finicky about what they put in their sig. I personally > think it's a good idea, and I would put those things in my sig if I posted > here enough for anyone to see it ;) > > Anybody else have an opinion on the signature idea James has? If people > like it and want to do it, I'll scratch up a webpage for the 'current > problems' list and post the link. Yes, I like the idea of a direct reference to the archives. Is it also possible to include a mailto: tag, that when clicked will invoke the user's mail program to start a NEW thread... that might help in cutting down on thread-hijacking. I know the mail is not html format, but a number of e-mail clients will recognize a mailto: item and make it "active" (clickable) These aren't really things for end-user sig lines, they should be added by the list server prior to distribution.
