Re: SRPMS or non-SRPMS discs ISO?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SRPMS or non-SRPMS discs ISO?
From: Markku Kolkka <markkukolkka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:19:09 +0300
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.6.2

rayzor@xxxxxxxxxxx kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika tiistai, 
22. kesäkuuta 2004 22:12):
> I am ready to download the ISO and I noticed there's the SRPMS
> and non-SRPMS discs. What is the difference between the two?

SRPMS contain the source code packages for the distribution, the 
other disks are the binary installation discs.

> What would determine what I need to download?

If you want to install Linux, get the non-SRPMS discs.

-- 
	Markku Kolkka
	markku.kolkka@xxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SRPMS or non-SRPMS discs ISO?
  - From: T. Nifty Hat Mitchell

References:
- SRPMS or non-SRPMS discs ISO?
  - From: rayzor

Prev by Date: Re: RH9 Upgrade to Fedora
Next by Date: *nice* maillog output
Previous by thread: SRPMS or non-SRPMS discs ISO?
Next by thread: Re: SRPMS or non-SRPMS discs ISO?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]