> Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:08:22 +0200 > From: Bob Marcan <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Bind Issues After FC2 > To: For users of Fedora Core releases > <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <40D6C1A6.1050507@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; > format=flowed > > edwarner99@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > >I did read the man pages, that's why I'm confused > as > >why it doesn't work now vs. FC1. > > > >I replaced the "/" in the directory directive to > >"/var/named". Did that just as a test. But now I'm > >still getting permission problems try to change to > >that directory. I've set permissions to 777, > ownership > >to root and named. > > > >Like I said, I read the man pages, as well as a > book I > >have here, but I'm not getting anywhere fast. > > > > > > > Take a look at /etc/rc.d/init.d/named: > .... > start() { > # Start daemons. > if [ -n "`/sbin/pidof named`" ]; then > echo -n $"$prog: already running" > return 1 > fi > echo -n $"Starting $prog: " > if [ -n "${ROOTDIR}" -a "x${ROOTDIR}" != "x/" ]; > then > OPTIONS="${OPTIONS} -t ${ROOTDIR}" > fi > daemon /usr/sbin/named -u named ${OPTIONS} > .... > Is named chrooted? > Look at /etc/sysconfig/named. > > -- > > Bob Marcan, Consultant Bob, I have never run this in chroot. Everything in /etc/sysconfig/named is commented out. I have not looked in /etc/rc.d/init.d/named. What would I see if it was chroot'ed? What do I change to get back to the original? Did something change in FC2 to break this? Thanks, __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail