Well I was not sure if these two nomenclature names were actually proxy servers. Are there relative advantages and disadvantages between the two other than anti-virus? Thanks Alexander -----Original Message----- From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 11:13 AM To: For users of Fedora Core releases Subject: Re: FC1 Proxy Servers Am Di, den 08.06.2004 schrieb Chalonec Roger um 17:05: > I am looking to implement proxy services on FC1 and I have noted that > there may be two. One called Privoxy and another called Squid. Does > anyone have experience with these or a better proxy server that run on > FC1? I am currently using Microsoft ISA as a proxy server on Intel. > Roger Your question is a bit unspecific. Both proxies are working great, while squid is certainly is known by more people than privoxy. I think privoxy has a better antiv-virus integration capability, if that counts. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.6.5-1.358 Serendipity 17:11:09 up 6 days, 17:29, load average: 0.43, 0.60, 0.45
