On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 11:20 -0700, T. 'Nifty New Hat' Mitchell wrote: And maybe a Nifty New Clock/TZ - or a Nifty Fast Route? This just in - seems to be several hours slow? ;^) > On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 01:58:20PM -0700, Rami Saarinen wrote: > .... .. > > At this point a single user machine with all service connections > turned off there is no compelling reason to run SELinux. Sure turned me off, and vice versa - back about test 2. > The whole purpose of SELinux is to place limits on applications and > users to improve the security of user data and compartmentalize > activities. It it is only you why bother because there are no groups > or activities to isolate. So except for education and caution why > bother. > > However in the context of large user count machines and large > enterprises SELinux will find a home. Yup - makes sense for work. > For me the education part is important. That's about the only reason I can come up with for running it at home, but guess that part of my education may have to wait a bit. > T o m M i t c h e l l > /dev/null the ultimate in secure storage. So does that complement </dev/random? (Sorry seem to be in a Smart ^$$ mood tonight. :-) Phil
