Re: only critical packages in minimal installation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael wrote:
anyone here figured out which are the critical packages and which can be
removed without causing any issues, ie. some fedora scripts might need them for
some reason?

[snip]

I noticed thie minimal install wasn't very minimal too. I removed a lot of those
packages after installation without any problem. Unfortunately, I didn't keep a
list. I can probably send you a list of the packages I kept though if that'd help.

I used the python script referenced here to determine which packages don't have any dependencies..
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/private/rpm-list/2004-February/msg00155.html


Then I removed the following packages..

rpm -e ash bc dos2unix ed eject finger ftp isdn4k-utils lha lrzsz mkbootdisk mtr nano nc procmail rdate rdist rsh talk tcpdump tcsh telnet traceroute unix2dos

I also replaced sendmail with postfix. The one remaining package that I'm not sure about is setarch. I'll look into that this weekend to see if I absolutely need it. I don't know if this is of any help but while I was at it, I also figured that I should disable some of the services that are enabled by default..

chkconfig --level 0123456 {gpm, irda, netdump, nfslock, pcmcia, portmap, rhnsd, rpcgssd, rpcidmapd, rpcsvcgssd} off



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux