fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
From: <fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 9:00 AM
Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 3, Issue 434


> Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Tripwire and Fedora (Michael Schwendt)
>    2. Re: feedback to NVidia [was: Nvidia Drivers] (Frederic Soulier)
>    3. FC2 on Thinkpad T21 (Gawrysiak, Piotr (GILW))
>    4. Re: Soundcard recognized but no sound (Paul D. Brown)
>    5. RE: splash screen - system hangs ? (tomislavp)
>    6. Re: rsyncing 79gb of data to 250gb drive (Jeff Vian)
>    7. Problems with usb on FC1 (eric tanguy)
>    8. Re: Anybody have any experience with RAID controllers under
>       Fedora? (Chris Adams)
>    9. Re: How to use NVIDIA Official driver on Fedora (Frederic Soulier)
>   10. Re: Disabling LVM check/startup on FC2 (Gabriel Labelle)
>   11. Re: tv card (Christopher Chan)
>   12. Still the anoying installer problem. (akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx)
>   13. Re: 6-in-1 card reader: works in fc1 and not in fc2 (Dave Jones)
>   14. Re: Soundcard recognized but no sound (Wade Hampton)
>   15. Re: Problems with usb on FC1 (Alexander Dalloz)
>   16. Changing the JVM that Tomcat uses (Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 15:26:54 +0200
> From: Michael Schwendt <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Tripwire and Fedora
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <20040526152654.574cad64.fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> On Wed, 26 May 2004 10:14:45 -0300, Bruno Tobias Stella wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 25 May 2004 23:40:33 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 25 May 2004 14:00:41 -0300, Bruno Tobias Stella wrote:
> > >
> > > >   I read some emails posted in this list and I'd like to know if:
> > > >
> > > > 1-) Today, is there a Tripwire Package for Fedora ?
> > >
> > > Yes, for Fedora Core 1 since the rebuild for FC2 has not happened
> > > yet. http://fedora.us "testing" repository. Your best bet is to fetch
the
> > > src.rpm and rebuild it on FC2, if you want it for FC2.
> >
> > I will use this "testing" tripwire in Fedora Core 1.
> > But, I don't know if somebody can help me, because the link
> >
"download.fedora.us/fedora/redhat/1/i386/SRPMS.testing/tripwire-2.3.1-18.fdr
.3.1.src.rpm"
> > is not found on that server. Are there somebody that knows another link
or rebuilds
> > this link ?
>
> Where did you find that link? It's wrong because 'redhat/1' would
> mean 'Red Hat Linux 1'.
>
> Binary for FC1:
>
>
http://download.fedora.us/fedora/fedora/1/i386/RPMS.testing/tripwire-2.3.1-1
8.fdr.3.1.i386.rpm
>
> Source:
>
>
http://download.fedora.us/fedora/fedora/1/i386/SRPMS.testing/tripwire-2.3.1-
18.fdr.3.1.src.rpm
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 13:27:59 +0100
> From: Frederic Soulier <frederic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: feedback to NVidia [was: Nvidia Drivers]
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <1085574479.4240.136.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 13:05, dalen wrote:
> > Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 19:28 -0500, dalen wrote:
> > >
> > >>When Rui suggests something constructive such as a method to play
> > >>TuxRacer without proprietary drivers, I may consider listening.  Until
> > >>then, rui_zealotry.pl is simply troll noise on this list.
> > >
> > >
> > > I did suggest something constructive:
> > >
> > >   a) To use your power as a costumer to create demand for Free
Software
> > >      drivers.
>
> How do I do that?
>
>
> > >   b) change your graphics card
> > >
> > > Using the proprietary driver, which even artificially restricts the
way
> > > you use your graphics card with MACROVISION, you will never have Free
> > > Software drivers, and you will be under the control imposed by NVIDIA.
> > >
> > > You're calling me a zealot, but in fact the zealot is you. You are the
> > > one who's blindly idolatring a company that wants to control what you
do
> > > with your computer.
>
> How is Nvidia controlling what I do with my computer?
> Don't compare Microsoft position with nVidia position, please. nVidia
> could be gone in a matter of months if they sleep for too long on their
> success. Let say they f*** up big time one generation of GPU and most
> sells will swing into ATI camp (or any other contenders to the top
> spots).
> If nVidia were to do something silly I could swap the card in a matter
> of minutes.
> I'm using open formats for my documents.
> I setup my computers in such a way that as long as I have my data backed
> up on a CD-R or DVD-R I'm safe.
> Neither nVidia nor Microsoft controls what I do with my computers.
> The key word is "dependence".
>
> > > Rui
> > >
> > What would be your choice for suggestion b?
>
> I would also be interested by an answer to b)
>
> --
> Frederic Soulier <frederic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 14:30:17 +0200
> From: "Gawrysiak, Piotr (GILW)" <Piotr.Gawrysiak@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: FC2 on Thinkpad T21
> To: "'fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx'" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <83A0A35C4606234EA2FE8664956D0D7002E65D97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Anyone installed Fedora Core 2 on IBM Thinkpad T21 and got suspend,
standby
> and hibernation working? (APM or ACPI - for me APM does not work at all,
and
> ACPI only partially...)
>
> Piotr Gawrysiak
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040526/8dc69e89/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 08:36:12 -0500
> From: "Paul D. Brown" <pdb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Soundcard recognized but no sound
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <20040526133612.GB24333@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 07:43:28AM -0500, Marc Mouries wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > With FC I can see in the control panel that my sound card
> > is well recognized. My soundblaster live is seen as "emu10k1"
> > but there is not sound.
> > I tried to raise the volume in the alsa mixer but it did not help.
> >
> > Any hints ?
> >
> > Marc
>
> It isn't still muted, is it?  The mixer starts with the volume zeroed
> and muted, I think.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 14:56:57 +0200
> From: "tomislavp" <perica@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: splash screen - system hangs ?
> To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <20040526130052.657554AD27@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> y,y,y, i get it
>
> sorry for such "questions", i am really new linux user, so sometimes i am
> blocked with really simple problems whatever so this is my fedora
conspiracy
> :):
>
> booting, start-up everything is ok, except last line, after mdmonitor(or
> mdpd), kernel do not support ... ?
>
> (unfortunately i can not see error, and do not know how to see log file in
> "Fail safe" mode)
>
> then next thing is:
>
> after login on, as root or normal user, system hangs at Splash screen.
>
> i tried with:
>
> Unprobe
>
> Generic LCD 800x600
>
> Monitor 800x600
>
>
>
> i can not save any monitor type, seems that is something with monitor,
gnome
> and X server
>
> when i trying to edit XF86Config file in fail safe terminal mode seems
that
> their is not such a file, possible ??
>
> i also tested memory and everything seems all right
>
> cheers
>
> tomislav
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Sean Estabrooks [ <mailto:seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> mailto:seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 12:43 PM
>
> To: perica@xxxxxxxxx
>
> Subject: Re: splash screen - system hangs ?
>
> On Mon, 24 May 2004 12:34:19 +0200
>
> "tomislavp" <perica@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > ++
>
> > if i want to boot in single mode (at grub, and type " single") system
>
> > hangs on "Enabling swap space: {OK}"
>
> > "sh-2.05# " <<<< list line ?
>
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> That's actually the successful conclusion of booting into single user
mode.
>
> It's a prompt waiting for you to type commands. Single user mode is
>
> non-graphical unless you start the GUI manually.
>
> Sean
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040526/c64eb059/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 08:35:16 -0500
> From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: rsyncing 79gb of data to 250gb drive
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <40B49D14.4090909@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
>
>
> James Wilkinson wrote:
>
> >Michael Mansour wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I have an issue which I can't seem to figure out.
> >>
> >>I bought a 250Gb Maxtor Maxline Plus ATA133 drive,
> >>plugged it into a server, formatted it using:
> >>
> >># e2fsck -m 0 -j -b 1024 /dev/hdc1
> >>
> >>
>
> formatted using e2fsck??
> Do you perchance mean mke2fs?
>
> >>I made the partition a Linux partition id 82.
> >>
> >>
>
> Type 82 is linux swap space, not filesystem space.
>
> >>After format, 241Gb free space is recognised.
> >>
> >>
>
> This seems reasonable
>
> >>I have 80Gb of data on another drive in the system
> >>that I wish to backup onto this drive. So after
> >>rsyncing the drives contents from the 79Gb (which is
> >>on a stripe) to the maxtor 250Gb drive, the following
> >>is the result:
> >>
> >>/dev/md6              85419328  79573952   1506236
> >>99% /data01
> >>/dev/hdc1            241201359 123508888 117692471
> >>52% /data02
> >>
> >>123Gb used??? this is what is confusing me, why?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ><snip>
> >
> >
> >>I thought maybe the rsync was following symlinks
> >>(which I'm sure there are none), but by default the
> >>
> >>
> >
> >What about hard links? Try
> >find /data01 -type f -links +1 -ls | sort
> >to see if there are any.
> >
> >HTH,
> >
> >James.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 15:12:12 +0200 (CEST)
> From: "eric tanguy" <eric.tanguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Problems with usb on FC1
> To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <33363.193.52.103.32.1085577132.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> I have an Asus motherboard A7N8X-VM/400 and i need to boot on winxp use
>   the usb drives and then reboot to linux to get them working properly. If
i
>   directly boot to linux the drives are not recognised. Someone could help
>   me to solve that ?
>   Regards
>   Eric
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 08:41:28 -0500
> From: Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Anybody have any experience with RAID controllers under
> Fedora?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <20040526134128.GC812137@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Once upon a time, Jeremy Brown <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> > Benjamin Arai wrote:
> > >Has anybody had any good experiences with RAID controllers under
> > >Fedora?  If so, which card and what happened.
> > >
> > A little OT, but I wholeheartedly recommend looking into Linux software
> > RAID, which delivers performance almost equal to that of most hardware
> > RAID controllers...and often a higher level of stability.
>
> I have several servers with AMI/LSI MegaRAID cards, and they are very
> good.  You can download a "megamgr" program from LSI's website that will
> let you manage the RAID arrays while the system is up (I have replaced a
> failed drive and rebuilt an array without the system ever going down).
>
> I have servers with software RAID and servers with hardware RAID.  If
> you are looking for data reliability, software RAID is fine.  If you are
> looking for server reliability, go with hardware RAID.
>
> What I mean is this: data reliability is when you don't lose data
> because of a disk failure.  The system may go down, or you may have to
> take it down to replace the failed disk, but you don't lose any data.
> Server reliability is when the system needs to be up and running 24x7;
> when a disk fails, you just want to know about it so you can install a
> replacement without the server ever going off-line.
>
> If you combine hardware RAID with LVM (and online filesystem resize
> patches), you can upgrade disk systems and increase storage space
> without ever shutting down or unmounting a filesystem.  I've done this
> several times under HP Tru64 Unix (with external storage array systems
> and Tru64's AdvFS filesystem).
>
> --
> Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
> I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 14:20:42 +0100
> From: Frederic Soulier <frederic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: How to use NVIDIA Official driver on Fedora
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <1085577642.4236.159.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 13:53, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 May 2004 13:38:00 +0100
> > Frederic Soulier <frederic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Well I guess it makes a lot of business sense to cross-license, buy a
> > > license for something you don't have, etc... instead of developing
> > > everything from scratch.
> >
> > We're talking about priorities.   When you reward companies that
> > do things that aren't in the best interests of the future of Linux
> > you're not helping Linux.
> >
> > > Ok so it's recommended because:
> > >   a) It's cheap
> > >   b) It's supported by Open Source drivers
> > >
> > > I agree b) is important.
> > >
> > > But what about a card recommended because:
> > >   a) it's top of the range
> > >   b) loads of features fully supported
> > >   c) 3D drivers on par or better than windows counterparts
> >
> > If you sell out the hope of long term gains for some immediate benefit
> > you haven't really won anything and the above benefits will evaporate
> > very quickly.
> >
> > Would you buy products from a company who used slave-labor-class
> > workers in remote parts of the world just because they had a cooler
> > logo or a more padded sole?   Sometimes the best decision isn't the
> > easiest one.
>
> Well, on a philosophical level I totally agree with you but just to
> throw some oil on the fire ;)
>
>   - how do you know for sure you're not using/buying something made
>     by a company using slave-labour?
>   - would you still leave in a country where a group of people robbed
>     this very same country from the true president?
>   - do you think it's ok to have the olympic games in China?
>   - do you think you eat good stuff, non-polluted, non-modified and so
>     on?
>   - haven't you bought any pepsi or coke at all? do you think they're
>     the most responsible corporations in the world?
>     Dou you drink only tap water? Are you sure the tap water you're
>     drinking is not polluted?
>   - What about Nike?
>   - How do you know that a company producing nice graphics cards with
>     nice open source drivers is not using some components made by a
>     a supplier that doesn't care about not polluting water when making
>     these very components :(
>
> This could go on and on. My point is if you wake up and start digging
> deep into these major issues and their ramifications then you may as
> well stop living :)
> Life's too short mate.
>
> Sorry for being really really off-topic for this list.
>
> --
> Frederic Soulier <frederic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 15:13:17 +0200 (CEST)
> From: "Gabriel Labelle" <glabelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Disabling LVM check/startup on FC2
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID:
> <28364.::ffff:194.119.123.25.1085577197.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
> > Optimized wrote:
> >
> >>My FC2 system is installed on linux raid volume but I have no use for
> >>LVM.
> >>
> >>I would like to disable the lvm check on system startup since it always
> >>fails, how should I proceed in order to make it clean?
> >>
> > FWIW this issue has been discussed on the linux-lvm mailing list (see
> > http://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm/2004-May/msg00059.html). The
> > /sbin/vgscan program incorrectly returns an error when there are no
> > volume groups. The problem will be fixed in the next release not that
> > this helps us now. It is currently fixed in CVS if you wished to build
> > lvm2 from that.*
> > *
> >
> > --
> > Paul (ganci@xxxxxxxxxx)
>
> Thank you Paul! This is the answer I was waiting for :)
>
> Gabriel (Optimized)
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 21:23:34 +0800
> From: Christopher Chan <cchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: tv card
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <40B49A56.90004@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> Chadley Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 06:44, Gordy Campbell wrote:
> >
> >>Hi All,
> >>
> >>I am quite new to Linux and was wondering whether or not I could get my
> >>TV card working in FC2?
> >>
> >>The TV card is a Wintv pci nova. I ran the hardware wizard and that
> >>tells me that the manufacturer is Philips Semiconductors and it has
> >>installed a driver called nuget-ci.
> >>
> >>I have tried running TVtimes i get a message saying 'no video source'
> >>and a message saying, 'cannot open video device /dev/video0
>
> dmesg. Maybe the driver had some problems. eg: I cannot use the DC10 I
> have because my mobo is a blinking VIA (KT266A) chipset.
>
> I am just happy the PCTV works at all.
> >>
> >>Anyone got any ideas,
> >>
> >>Gordy
> >
> > Hi Gordy
> > Although there are ways and means of getting the the card working it is
> > a bit of a tricky situation.
> > If you are running FC1 you are in a spot because you will probably have
> > to add v4l (video 4 linux), I found it very difficult and expensive when
> > you use a modem connection.
>
> add? v4l is available already on RH9.
>
> I have a Miro PCTV and it works out of the box.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 08:52:16 -0500
> From: akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Still the anoying installer problem.
> To: Fedora-List <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <20040526135216.GA6687@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> As I suspected the installer in FC2 still has the following anoying
> problem. You create the root user before you decide that you don't
> want to use md5 passwds. So root has a md5 passwd that screws up
> passwd autherization ant least if you are using NIS.
> Why was this done? It would have been easy to make the default
> non-md5 passwds.
> --
> -------------------------------------------
> Aaron Konstam
> Computer Science
> Trinity University
> One Trinity Place.
> San Antonio, TX 78212-7200
>
> telephone: (210)-999-7484
> email:akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 14:50:37 +0100
> From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: 6-in-1 card reader: works in fc1 and not in fc2
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <1085579437.19066.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 13:33, Atul Chitnis wrote:
>
> > I have reported the problem in bugzilla:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124139
>
> Looks like another that needs adding to the whitelist.
> Can you do the test as described in the post I just made to the bug ?
>
> > after this, the kernel should scan for partitions /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2,
> > etc. but it doesnt. This is the same whether I use a single LUN device
> > like the Cruzer (as shown above) or a multi-LUN device like a 7-in-1
card
> > reader.
>
> Multi-lun devices like these need to get added as they get found to
> the whitelist right now.  In the future we'll have to do something
> better about these, like having kudzu detect them, and put the
> relevant lines in your /etc/modprobe.conf  saving us having to do a
> kernel update just to update the whitelist.
>
> We can't just turn on multi-lun probing on all devices, as this
> breaks some devices, by locking up the scsi bus when non-existant
> lun's are probed.
>
> > If this bug is confirmed, I'd treat it with a sense of urgency - these
> > days, just about everyone uses USB-storage devices, and this is a
definite
> > show-stopper.
>
> I've just been through bugzilla and added a load of these devices
> to the whitelist (and sent them upstream too).  If you or anyone
> else comes across any further devices that don't work without
> max_luns tweaking after tomorrows kernel, then please let me know about
> them, and I'll make sure they get added.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 09:53:08 -0400
> From: Wade Hampton <wade.hampton@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Soundcard recognized but no sound
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <40B4A144.2090600@xxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Paul D. Brown wrote:
>
> >On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 07:43:28AM -0500, Marc Mouries wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>With FC I can see in the control panel that my sound card
> >>is well recognized. My soundblaster live is seen as "emu10k1"
> >>but there is not sound.
> >>I tried to raise the volume in the alsa mixer but it did not help.
> >>
> >>Any hints ?
> >>
> >>Marc
> >>
> >>
> >
> >It isn't still muted, is it?  The mixer starts with the volume zeroed
> >and muted, I think.
> >
> >
> Are you playing a CD or a sound clip (for example, via XMMS)?  If playing
> a CD and this is a newer machine, often they are shipped without the cable
> from the CD drive to the sound card so a standard CD play program on Linux
> will not produce audio (but it works fine under Windows as WMP reads
> the sound from the CD, loads it into the CPU, does pretty graphics,
> and writes it out to the audio device).
>
> Any Linux-based CD players that do the same thing as WMP (nice eye
> candy)?
>
> Good luck,
> --
> Wade Hampton
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 15:56:46 +0200
> From: Alexander Dalloz <alexander.dalloz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Problems with usb on FC1
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <1085579805.4717.317.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Am Mi, den 26.05.2004 schrieb eric tanguy um 15:12:
>
> > I have an Asus motherboard A7N8X-VM/400 and i need to boot on winxp use
> >   the usb drives and then reboot to linux to get them working properly.
If i
> >   directly boot to linux the drives are not recognised. Someone could
help
> >   me to solve that ?
> >   Regards
> >   Eric
>
> Is USB Legacy support on in the motherboard BIOS? If yes, then set it
> off.
>
> Alexander
>
>
> --
> Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
> Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2188.nptl
> Sirendipity 15:56:02 up 3 days, 21:52, load average: 0.37, 0.39, 0.39
>                    [ Î"νÏ?θι Ïf'αÏ.Ï"ον - gnothi seauton ]
>              my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
> Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040526/322624e2/attachment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 16:00:26 +0200
> From: "Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel" <jan-pieter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Changing the JVM that Tomcat uses
> To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <015401c44329$cc7caf20$0264a8c0@janpieter>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a problem changing the JVM that Tomcat uses from the one from
the Free Software Foundation to the one from Sun. I've installed the
J2SDK1.4.2_04 from Sun and have added the JAVA_HOME environment variable ( =
/usr/java/j2sdk1.4.2_04) to /etc/profile. But after restarting Tomcat, it
still uses the JVM from the Free Software Foundation. How can I change this?
> When i use the command 'env' i can see that the JAVA_HOME environment
variable is present and pointing to the correct location.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel
>
> My system: Fedora Core 1, Tomcat 4.1.27.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040526/ca7f73f6/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
>
> End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 3, Issue 434
> *******************************************
>
>



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux