> Am Mo, den 24.05.2004 schrieb James Marcinek um 21:40: > >> The cross post came after I didn't get any feedback from the BIND >> mailling >> list. I upgraded from 8 to 9 (along with the Red Hat distros) and I did >> no >> special chroot for this. >> >> James > > Well, what do you expect? You post at about Mon, 24 May 2004 14:55:26 > -0400 (EDT) on the bind list and at 15:08:55 here and the other 2 RH > lists. > > And with RH9 you are wrong here, as well on the Taroon list. RH9 had no > bind chroot. Your named.conf/named.custom must be invalid. > > Alexander Thanks for nothing Alexander. When I want some advice I'll know not to listen to yours. I figured out that much. James > > > -- > Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 > Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2188.nptl > Sirendipity 22:30:07 up 2 days, 4:26, load average: 1.35, 1.48, 1.41 > [ Î?νÏ?θι Ï?'αÏ?Ï?ον - gnothi seauton ] > my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list >
