Anyone have an xstartup file configuration that works for realvnc? I am having a bunch of trouble getting gnome to my vnc client. It worked fine for me in red hat 9.... is there some security stuff that I am missing that has been added to FC2? Here is my xstartup config file as it is now... It doesn't work... I just get a blank grey screen ********************************************************************************** #!/bin/sh # Uncomment the following two lines for normal desktop: unset SESSION_MANAGER exec /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc [ -x /etc/vnc/xstartup ] && exec /etc/vnc/xstartup [ -r $HOME/.Xresources ] && xrdb $HOME/.Xresources xsetroot -solid grey vncconfig -iconic & xterm -geometry 80x24+10+10 -ls -title "$VNCDESKTOP Desktop" & gnome-session & *************************************************************************************** Michael Marsh m@xxxxxxxx > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 3, Issue 324 > From: fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > Date: Fri, May 21, 2004 8:25 am > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > > You can reach the person managing the list at > fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Windows XP Pro & FC2 - XP won't boot (John Chapman) > 2. Re: Fedora Core2 -> Enterprise (David Gavin) > 3. Re: Lucent Winmodem (Chadley Wilson) > 4. Re: rhythmbox/gstreamer mp3 support (Douglas Furlong) > 5. Re: nvidia and FC2 (jerry) > 6. Re: Simple RealPlayer/Multimedia Solution (Gregory Gulik) > 7. Re: stable Fedora releases? (Jack Howarth) > 8. Re: stable Fedora releases? (Douglas Furlong) > 9. FC/2 constantly reboots when trying to install (Grobe) > 10. Installing Fedora Core 2 on Virtual PC (Mike McCollister) > 11. Re: stable Fedora releases? (Phil Schaffner) > 12. Installation problem (Jiri Kanak) > 13. Re: nvidia and FC2 (Rui Miguel Seabra) > 14. Re: stable Fedora releases? (Jack Howarth) > 15. Re: stable Fedora releases? (Will Backman) > 16. Re: Fedora Core2 -> Enterprise (Phil Schaffner) > 17. startup programs? (Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak) > 18. RE: i2o - howto install? (-=Brian Truter=-) > 19. Re: nvidia and FC2 (Luc Bouchard) > 20. Multiple speed problems (Michael) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:00:39 -0400 > From: John Chapman <chapmanj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Windows XP Pro & FC2 - XP won't boot > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <40AE1997.9000906@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > I have had this exact same issue. > > Go into your BIOS and change the hard drive access modes of both hard > drives to LBA not AUTO, after installing FC2 the bios will try to > access it in CHS mode which Windows XP doesnt support. > > John Chapman > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 10:42:42 -0400 (EDT) > From: "David Gavin" <dgavin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora Core2 -> Enterprise > To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <54148.165.236.198.34.1085150562.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > > I had to change an RH 8.0 system to RHEL3 recently and ended up > having > to do a new install as here was no upgrade option offered during the > install. > Besides, as upgrading to 2.6 seems to be fairly disruptive - I > wouldn't > expect to see it offered in RHEL3 for quite a while - probably not > until > the next major point release. > > Dave > > howarth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Jack Howarth) said: > > Is there a rough date yet for the next Enterprise Linux > > release based off of Fedora Core2? I am setting up a new > > computational workstation soon and would really like to > > start off with a Linux 2.6 based release but am afraid > > installing Fedora Core 2 and then trying to upgrade to > > the next RedHat Enterprise Linux over that will be a rather > > messy proposition. > > Jack > > > > > > -- > > fedora-list mailing list > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 16:58:27 +0200 > From: Chadley Wilson <chadley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Lucent Winmodem > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1085151507.27087.96.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 16:37, John Chapman wrote: > > I just installed Fedora Core 2 and I cannot find a driver that works > with the 2.6 kernel for my Lucent WinModem. Does anyone know where I > can find an RPM or the source code for 2.6? > > > > > John Chapman > Try www.smlink.com > -- > Chadley - Linux Rocks > Welcome to my world. > ****************************************************************** > This mail is free for distribution. You are free to - delete it - > resend > it - use it in anyway that makes you happy. I am not responsible for > it > or its content due to ignorance. > Enjoy the adventures of Linux > ******************************************************************* > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 15:22:26 +0100 > From: Douglas Furlong <douglas.furlong@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: rhythmbox/gstreamer mp3 support > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1085149345.10346.105.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 15:08, Davy Brion wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 14:57, relaxed wrote: > > > Rhythmbox still complains with the message, "there is no plugin > > > > installed to handle a MP3 file." I've searched google, mailing > lists, > > > and asked in #fedora but haven't found any answers. The > gstreamer.spec > > > and rhythmbox.spec didn't give me any clues either... > > > Thanks for your time. > > > > i think you also need libid3tag... you can get it from freshrpms > > > > i installed libmad, libid3tag, and the gstreamer-plugins-mp3 package > and > > then rhythmbox was able to play mp3s just fine > Is any one aware of how to get the ripping tool Sound juicer to encode > as MP3? > > Doug > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 11:44:44 -0400 > From: jerry <jerrywone@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: nvidia and FC2 > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <40ACD26C.3050302@xxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Chris Jones wrote: > > > > >> Ask NVIDIA, they're the only one entity who can help you. > > > > > > Well I've poked about on their web site and forums as much as I can > > and not found anything. I could email them I suppose, but guessed > they > > probably get lots on this issue so I wouldn't hold up much hope for a > > > fast reply. I was hoping someone had some insider knowledge, or just > > > more than me.. > > > > > well, people could flood them with requests til they decide to be > socially conscious and OPEN them! anybody think that peaking their > requests would have any effect on their business practices? > > i went with their chipset and graphics chip, but am regretting the > choice. should have voted with my $$... unfortunately, i did what was > > on the shelf :-( > > it used to be that you couldn't do anything, but some improvement, FAR > > FROM WHAT IT SHOULD BE. btw, the two RMSs duking it out on the issue a > > while back, were those really stallman in disguise? ;-) > > jerry > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 09:37:17 -0500 > From: Gregory Gulik <greg@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Simple RealPlayer/Multimedia Solution > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <40AE141D.6020708@xxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > > > Thanks, I tried two different versions off that page but neither work. > > The HelixPlayer gave me an error that it's unable to view that type of > > file and the alpha RealPlayer looked like it was playing but no image > or > sound came was aparent. > > Can you play this link with your player? > > http://www.gagme.com/greg/diving/dive176-15fps-none.ram > > Did you need to install anything special? > > Jack Aboutboul wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > I'm glad to be writing this email. It seems that many users' > > multimedia playback issues will be solved by this simple, > > straight-forward solution. You can now download an alpha, albeit, > > pretty stable, version of RealPlayer. All you need to do is go to > > http://player.helixcommunity.org/2004/downloads/ and download the > rpm > > linked to from the RealPlayer Alpha table. You will want the Linux > > x86(Sun JDS, others) one. > > All you need to do is rpm -Uvh, and youll get a nice new RealPlayer > > which will even install mozilla plugins and a menu entry for you. > It > > even has a native gtk interface. WOW!! > > It can play the following media formats. Real Audio/Video, Ogg > Vorbis, > > Ogg Theora, MP3, SMIL, Flash, MPEG4, RTSP and more. It also has > support > > for Accelerated Video and Fullscreen playback. > > I think it is safe to say, that there is no an easy, simple, > convenient > > way to get a way above decent multimedia setup for Fedora. So let it > be > > written, so let it be done. > > > > Word, > > Jack > > > > P.S. For all other media formats, just use mplayer and mozplugger > and > > stop crying. > > > > > > -- > Greg Gulik http://www.gulik.org/greg/ > greg @ gulik.org > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:10:57 -0400 (EDT) > From: howarth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Jack Howarth) > Subject: Re: stable Fedora releases? > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <20040521151057.770601DC0EB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks for all of the replies on this topic. > I should clarify that I am not as concerned about minor > glitches in the actual Fedora Core releases but rather > being able to get timely security updates without de-evolving > a machine installed with Fedora Core to a test release. > It seems this is unlikely to be avoided. > I will probably just purchase academic licenses for > RedHat Enterprise Linux but I would note that RedHat > doesn't go out of their way to help you find them on > their web site. Also, I am still a bit concerned about > the degree of forking RedHat has introduced with this > release strategy. Before they had become the reference > release and scientific software was often marked as > compatible with a certain RedHat release. Now with > Fedora this has become a murky target. > Jack > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 15:29:27 +0100 > From: Douglas Furlong <douglas.furlong@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: stable Fedora releases? > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1085149766.10346.109.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 15:18, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Okay, up front I realize that Fedora is a hobbyist release... > > but the same could be said of Debian. With that said, is there > > any plan in place for eventually having a benchmark stable Fedora > > release which would be equivalent to the Stable branch of Debian? > > I ask because it is unclear if one will be able to install a Core > > release and get access to the proper security patches without > > constantly upgrading Fedora to the point of it reverting back to > > a Test release (for the next Core of course). I know in the > > academic environment many folks are looking at Fedora as a successor > > to RedHat 9 but I am afraid it is more likely to be a Debian > > Unstable type release at best. > > Jack > I'm not entirly sure what you are asking. > > However I know that Fedora will be maintaining patches for around 1.5 > release cycles. > > However http://www.fedoralegacy.org/ should be picking up where fedora > leaves with regards to security patches. > > Doug > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 10:13:36 -0500 > From: Grobe <gary@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: FC/2 constantly reboots when trying to install > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <6ED004A8-AB39-11D8-A31E-00039398C980@xxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > > Hey all, > > I just downloaded fedora core 2 and am trying to install it on a new > Compaq Presario w/ a 2.7GHz Celeron. Problem is it goes two lines into > > the install and reboots. > > Loading vmlinuz ....... > Loading initrd.img ......... (then reboots at this point) > > I've tried options w/ text, mediacheck, and noprobe and nothing works. > > The cd boots fine if I put it on another machine. > > Any help much appreciated. > > Gary > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 08:15:39 -0700 (PDT) > From: Mike McCollister <mikemccollister@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Installing Fedora Core 2 on Virtual PC > To: Red Hat Fedora LIST <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20040521151539.40942.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hi, > > I have tried to install Fedora Core 2 on Virtual PC (in Windows XP) but > can't > get it past the first reboot. During the install, I had to use text > mode as > the graphical mode install would not work. After the first reboot I > get a > series of segmentation faults. For example, one of the lines is > > /etc/X11/prefdm: line 47: 323 Segmentation fault which gdm >/dev/null > 2>&1 > > I've booted from the DVD and went into rescue mode and changed the > xorg.conf > file to use 24 or 32 bit mode without any success. I also set the init > level > to 3 and it boots into text mode OK. However, when I type a command > like "more > xorg.conf" I get a segmentation fault but if I type the command again > there is > no fault. > > Any suggestions or has anyone gotten Core 2 to install on Virtual PC? > > Thanks, > > Mike > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Domains ? Claim yours for only $14.70/year > http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:15:44 -0400 > From: Phil Schaffner <Philip.R.Schaffner@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: stable Fedora releases? > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1085152544.12240.164.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 10:27, Paul Chauvet wrote: > > Honestly, if you are looking for something as a successor in the > > Academic Environment that is rock solid, look at RH Enterprise Linux > > again. Their academic pricing (without support, but with updates) > are > > incredibly cheap ($50 for servers $25 for workstations). > > > > We have a couple of labs and a dozen servers (some of the servers > with > > support contracts though which brings the price way up though but it > is > > worth it). I and some other computer staff/students still use > Fedora > > Core (1 and now 2) on their desktops. We also use Fedora Core on > some > > of our less critical servers. If you need the rock solid stability, > > then that is what Red Hat Enterprise is really meant to be for, and > for > > an academic price, it is very affordable. > > For those reading this thread who may not qualify for academic > pricing, > and want more stability than Fedora will offer, consider looking at > some > of the RHEL rebuilds: > > http://whiteboxlinux.org/ > http://www.taolinux.org/ > http://www.centos.org/ > > Phil > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 17:13:51 +0200 > From: Jiri Kanak <Jiri.Kanak@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Installation problem > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <40AE1CAF.7040305@xxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > > Hi all, > > finaly i have decided to fresh install FC2. > During first boot after installation a have configured NIS and edited > /etc/auto.master to use yp:auto_home for /home dir. > > After next reboot, i can't see any file in /usr. > > Wondering why, i have done another fresh installation, which lead into > > the same result. > > Any idea? > > > Jiri > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 16:17:00 +0100 > From: Rui Miguel Seabra <rms@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: nvidia and FC2 > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <1085152620.2801.51.camel@roque> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 11:44 -0400, jerry wrote: > > it used to be that you couldn't do anything, but some improvement, > FAR > > FROM WHAT IT SHOULD BE. btw, the two RMSs duking it out on the issue > a > > while back, were those really stallman in disguise? ;-) > > If you mean me, no. > > But I learned to value Free Software.. before... I didn't care either. > > Rui > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 189 bytes > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part > Url : > /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040521/639966de/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 14 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:17:57 -0400 (EDT) > From: howarth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Jack Howarth) > Subject: Re: stable Fedora releases? > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <20040521151757.12F731DC0EB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Doug, > Well my concern would be the speed and depth of the security > updates > from www.fedoralegacy.org. As I mentioned in another message, one of > my main concerns was the forking of these RedHat releases with the > Fedora/Enterprise split. The need go to yet another party for > security updates for Fedora introduces yet another fork in the > process. > I would use Debian but I am afraid they won't have the same ease of > use for configuring such things a software RAID 1 mirrors during > installation. > Jack > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 15 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 10:58:16 -0400 > From: Will Backman <whb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: stable Fedora releases? > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1085151496.1922.21.camel@d1ntpm41> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 10:46, Randy Ramsdell wrote: > > Jack Howarth wrote: > > > > > Okay, up front I realize that Fedora is a hobbyist release... > > >but the same could be said of Debian. With that said, is there > > >any plan in place for eventually having a benchmark stable Fedora > > >release which would be equivalent to the Stable branch of Debian? > > >I ask because it is unclear if one will be able to install a Core > > >release and get access to the proper security patches without > > >constantly upgrading Fedora to the point of it reverting back to > > >a Test release (for the next Core of course). I know in the > > >academic environment many folks are looking at Fedora as a > successor > > >to RedHat 9 but I am afraid it is more likely to be a Debian > > >Unstable type release at best. > > > Jack > > > > > Well rh9, 8 , etc.. are also hobbyist releases, which is funny that I > > > have installed those in my company for essential servers that must be > > > stable. But I guess my company isn't up to par with the big companies > > > that need the REAL Redhat for their servers. FUD in reverse? Or > better > > yet, the FUD cycle? > > > > Oh was this what you asked? > > > > Anyway, it would probably be better to use Debian right now. > > Stable has a couple of meanings. > There is stable, as in "doesn't crash" and stable as in "things don't > change". > I think the goal of Fedora is to test new stuff, so things should be > unstable in the second sense. > RedHat had a policy where minor number changes had binary > compatibility, > and major number changes broke stuff. I don't think Fedora tries to > provide continuity between releases. Anaconda does its best. For > most > of us, this is ok. We back up our home directories, and reinstall. > For > servers with a long life, you want the "if it ain't broke don't fix > it" > design, which you can get with their enterprise products. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 16 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:20:43 -0400 > From: Phil Schaffner <Philip.R.Schaffner@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora Core2 -> Enterprise > To: Dave Gavin <dgavin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core > releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1085152842.12240.169.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 10:42, David Gavin wrote: > > I had to change an RH 8.0 system to RHEL3 recently and ended up > having > > to do a new install as here was no upgrade option offered during the > > install. > > What you wanted was the "upgradeany" option. The link is for > WhiteBox, > but the same technique has been reported to work for RHEL: > > http://beau.org/pipermail/whitebox-users/2004-March/000898.html > > Phil > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 17 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 10:09:38 -0400 > From: "Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak" <mjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: startup programs? > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <40AE0DA2.9040007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > > Hi, > > FC1 has a Preferences > More Preferences > Sessions menu where startup > > programs can be added (to automatically start programs after login), > and > the "prompt before logout" can be disabled. > > This seems to have vanished in FC2. Where can I find it? > > > - Mike > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 18 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 10:22:16 -0500 > From: "-=Brian Truter=-" <brian@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: i2o - howto install? > To: "'For users of Fedora Core releases'" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <E1BRBoz-0007Xh-MX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > > Thank you Warren! > > > > > > This procedure worked perfectly. A few warnings are displayed on > > > screen, but they seem to have been non-critical. The system > > rebooted > > > perfectly. Thanks for your help. > > > > > > I installed the raidutils from http://i2o.shadowconnect.com > > but there > > > seems to be an issue with that. > > > I loaded the i2o_config module, then tested the raidutils with the > > > > command "raidutil -L logical". Here is the info: > > > > > > [root@fc2test root]# raidutil -L logical Engine connect failed: > > > COMPATIBILITY number [root@fc2test root]# lsmod | grep i2o > > > i2o_config 9616 0 > > > i2o_proc 40476 0 > > > i2o_block 13600 7 > > > i2o_core 39280 3 i2o_config,i2o_proc,i2o_block > > > [root@fc2test root]# l /dev/i2o/ctl > > > crw------- 1 root root 10, 166 Feb 23 15:02 /dev/i2o/ctl > > > [root@fc2test root]# rpm -q raidutils > > > raidutils-0.0.4-1 > > > > > > > > > > http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/2.6/RPMS.kernel/ > > Please try the latest test kernel from here first. It has a > > few more i2o related fixes. Please report back. > > > > Warren Togami > > wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > -- > > fedora-list mailing list > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > > > Sorry it took me so long to reply, Warren. I got a chance to install > the new > kernel this morning. Here is the results: > > [root@fc2test root]# uname -a > Linux brian 2.6.6-1.374 #1 Wed May 19 12:44:14 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 > GNU/Linux > [root@fc2test root]# lsmod | grep i2o > i2o_proc 50972 0 > i2o_config 11280 0 > i2o_block 16160 7 > i2o_core 41968 3 i2o_proc,i2o_config,i2o_block > [root@fc2test root]# raidutil -L logical > osdIOrequest : File /dev/dpti17 Could Not Be Opened > Engine connect failed: COMPATIBILITY number > > > I think /dev/dpti17 is the character device for the dpt_i2o driver, > isn't > it? > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 19 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:23:42 -0400 > From: Luc Bouchard <luc@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: nvidia and FC2 > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1085153022.3763.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 04:57, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote: > > Software patents are a nightmare, and they must be taken down. > > There are only two ways to do it: > > prevent them from existing (what we're trying to do in Europe) > > > Hate to burst your bubble, however quite the opposite is happening in > Europe as shown by posts in this very forum. > > Luc Bouchard > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 20 > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:24:18 -0400 > From: "Michael" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Multiple speed problems > To: "Fedora Users" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <200405211526.i4LFQwu02032@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I am having a problem with FC2 that just started yesterday evening. > All was > fine the day before yesterday and when I started my system yesterday, > everything was moving at an extremely slow speed. At startup, as the > machine is going through loading all of the DSO's, each one of them > takes an > extremely long time (30-40 seconds) to load and there are a couple > like > sendmail and vsftpd that take 5-10 minutes to load. Once everything > is > loaded and I log in to the box, anything that I try to start, from > file > managers to consoles to text editors takes several minutes to load. I > also > tried using yum since this all started to update a couple packages and > I am > receiving a msg that says [errno 4] I/Oerror: <url open error >. Also > there > are 2 errors that show up consistently in the syslog since this started > and > they are; > > kernel: cdrom: open failed; and > mdmpd: mdmpd failed; > > - there is also another error that showed in the syslog prior to this > problem and continues to show since the problem started which says > kernel: there is already a security framework initialized, > register_security > failed > Kernel: Failure registering capabilities with the kernel > > I have no idea what is causing these problems. Any help anyone can > give > would be greatly appreciated. > > Mike > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 3, Issue 324 > *******************************************
