dethcrush wrote: > Is core2 partition manager better than core1? > I had some serious problems with core1. > 1 Size Partions were inserted between the original > ones. Install couldn't find any data after that. Colin Charles replied: > How about giving it a go and telling us? Did you Bugzilla the "problem" > you encountered with Core 1? Sounds very like the one I reported: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109812 Six months later it's still "Status: New". (I had had a nicely laid out disk, with the partitions numbered in the order they appeared on disk. Anaconda thought I didn't have enough space in /var, so I deleted and recreated /var and /usr. Disk Druid renumbered all the partitions after /var and /usr, including a VFAT partition, giving the new /var and /usr the highest partition numbers). As I pointed out at the time, some software will refuse to handle this, considering it a straight bug; Fedora 1 fdisk prints a warning message; if there'd been an NT-based OS on that partition, then that would probably have been hosed; and if anything else rewrites the partition table ever, the chances are it will put everything back into physical order, moving everything round AGAIN. It will probably take me a while to get time to experiment with FC2. -- E-mail address: james@ | Q. "Why can't I print?" westexe.demon.co.uk | A. "Because you're not a printer." | -- Stephen Judd
