Same here, BIOS is the latest (1.13) and every memtest runs till the end like a charm. I also had a RH9 running for almost a year without probs, and just installed a FC1 without probs. Seems 2.6.x doesnt like Epia. :/ I will stay with FC1 and wait for FC3. ;) Thanks for the response! Bye, Andy. -----Original Message----- From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Andy Green Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 12:46 PM To: For users of Fedora Core releases Subject: Re: FC2 and Via Epia -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 19 May 2004 11:37, Dave Jones wrote: > This one is puzzling (its in bugzilla already, though I don't have > the number to hand). It only seems to affect certain users, and the > only thing we've established so far is that it seems to be a motherboard > (or BIOS) problem rather than CPU related. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120685 I updated the BIOS radically, from a very old vintage to the latest when I first met the problem, it had no effect. 2.6.5-1.327 boots on it, but no later kernel does. However, even with that I have stability problems, the board will not stay up for more than 48 hours. It is NOT heat, I can hold my hand on the passive heatsink just fine... and although I would be happy to entertain the idea of a flaky board, this exact setup has been living under my TV for a year or so on 24/7 for months at a time with zero crashes. This was on RH9 with 2.4 kernel and then FC1 retrofitted with an early Arjan 2.6 test kernel. - -Andy - -- Automatic actions for USB cameras, cardreaders, memory sticks, MP3 players http://warmcat.com/usbautocam -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAqzrxjKeDCxMJCTIRAp77AJ91A1DCkKyM2HiJ7RWUrVfpqDnqoQCcCNix o0Az5QNh0aDr8pO2j4VO0Tg= =NrTM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
