Re: kernell compiled from source against rpm ones...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Di, den 18.05.2004 schrieb Coume - Lubox.com um 13:30:

> usually when I speak to someone about kernel, they all tell that I should not use rpm
> kernel and compile my own ones...

That someone is giving you arguments about that opinion? Which are them?
If not, it is just hot air.

> But what are the advanateg of compiled kernel against rpm ones? Will it speed up my
> boot time? or make my system more stable?

No and no.

If you self have no serious reasons for a self compiled kernel it will
be wasted time.

> Ludo

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2188.nptl
Sirendipity 14:19:47 up 5 days, 12:04, load average: 0.07, 0.27, 0.28 
                   [ ÎÎÏÎÎ Ï'ÎÏÏÎÎ - gnothi seauton ]
             my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux