Well, since the OP hasn't provided any more info, might as well continue this discussion... John Nichel said: > William Hooper wrote: >> John Nichel said: >> [snip] >> >>><gripe> >>>Install from source, not RPM's. >> >> >> Why? > > Custom configuration. And such things as MySQL (the php-mysql rpm is > compiled against the 3.x libraries), but since I use 4.x, I would rather > compile with that. So, based on your needs, your blanket recommendation is that everyone should install Apache and PHP from source? Many people are using the provided RPMs just fine. >> >>>Read the PHP recomendation about NOT >>>using Apache2 and PHP together. >>></gripe> >> >> >> I defer to Joe Orton's response. >> >> http://www.redhat.com/archives/taroon-list/2004-May/msg00188.html >> > > I like how Joe calls it FUD by _some_ members of the PHP community. How > about THE member of the PHP community? I defer to just one of the many > Ramsus Lerdorf responses.... > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-general&m=107920318223044&w=2 So this is to say that php.net mirror servers are not "production-quality"? I can understand the PHP developers suggesting Apache1 over Apache2, but to the extent they go it is (as Joe pointed out) FUD. -- William Hooper
