On Sat, 2004-05-15 at 02:31 +0100, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote: > On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 19:24 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > > Can you substantiate or in any way support that claim? What you or I > > *think* is rather irrelevant, but what I posted is directly sourced from > > several Red Hat engineers and managers and I consider it a fact. > > > > You keep saying "I think," "I don't think," and "it might." Kindly stick to > > facts: what do you *know* about this topic? Can you provide *any* evidence > > whatsoever that backs up your statements? > > What, you mean that community provided and tested software collections > isn't enough to tell you the process isn't the very same one? > > Do you have any installation of RHEL? Note that I'm not commenting on the quality, but that there are evidently different procedures. I personally prefer a more relaxed one, but saying that FC and RHEL follow the same procedures is putting it quite mildy :) Rui
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
