Re: Why Would Fedora be Free ? Can it be Trusted?

["admin@xxxxxxxxxxx" <admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I've heard of this also. 

Jeremy Brown wrote:

> Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
>
> > While your explanation of the birth of GNU/Linux is excellent, the 
> > above paragraphs are a crock. As far as I know and recall, only a 
> > very small part of the software market "used to have" those four 
> > freedoms. None of the early Unix variants that I recall were either 
> > Free (capitalized to mean open-source and with those freedoms) or 
> > free (with a price of zero).
>
>
> I may be incorrect on my UNIX history, but my understanding was that 
> during the early Bell labs years (especially before the explosion of 
> personal computers) UNIX source was distributed with almost no regard 
> for software licensing, and for "free" monetarily as well--or at most 
> around the cost of media.  Even after UNIX was copyrighted, relatively 
> "free" implementations like BSD and Minix still existed.
>
> Jeremy