On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 22:06 -0400, William Hooper wrote: > Colin Charles said: > > On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 02:30, Jean-Rene Cormier wrote: > >> Hi, I'm not sure which list this should go in but will Samba be updated > >> to 3.0.4 on FC1 because of the password changing bug due to one of the > >> latest MS hotfix breaking it? > > > > It will actually be interesting to note this, since FC2 is almost out, > > and the version of samba there is 3.0.3-5 - you might want to file an > > RFE in Bugzilla for the update, but don't hold your breath > > Don't bother. > > [whooper@poit whooper]$ rpm -q --changelog samba | head > * Tue May 04 2004 Jay Fenlason <fenlason@xxxxxxxxxx> 3.0.3-5 > > - Patch to allow password changes from machines patched with > Microsoft hotfix MS04-011. > - Include patches for https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1302 > and https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1309 > > * Thu Apr 29 2004 Jay Fenlason <fenlason@xxxxxxxxxx> 3.0.3-4 > > - Samba 3.0.3 released. > [whooper@poit whooper]$ So basically I have to install the FC2 package and there won't be an update for FC1? The Fedora website says "updates for Fedora Core 1 will be provided for two to three months after the release of Fedora Core 2". Is this update not considered critical or is it that they already stopped updating FC1? I know it's not a bug that the packager or even the Samba team is responsible for but it breaks some functionality in the program. What I'd like to know is if these kind of bugs are not considered critical since it's not a security issue or anything like that and if I should expect that bugs like this won't get fixed in current releases of Fedora or in releases that haven't reach end of life yet. Jean-Rene Cormier
