Re: 2.3.4 glibc and cvs snapshot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:28:00PM +1000, Robert Murphy wrote:
> The problem may be that I'm looking in the wrong place. I'm also not
> sure that I understand what you mean; how do the glibc 2.3.4 symbols get
> to be there, if not in a glibc?

That's exactly right, the symbols come from glibc. If a program is
compiled against a glibc that provides 2.3.4 symbols, it's possible that
it will need 2.3.4 symbols to run, so you will need to install a glibc
that provides 2.3.4 symbols.

> The other problem is that Fedora sites I'm looking at _don't_ seem to
> have snaphots of glibc, and the main cvs seems to be permanently busy,
> or offline. I've really been having a hard time with this, could someone
> just give me a shove in the right direction?

It sounds to me like you're pulling packages from Fedora Core 2 test
releases or development snapshots. If you're doing that, get glibc
from the Fedora Core 2 test releases or development snapshots too.
That will fix your problem.

-Barry K. Nathan <barryn@xxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux