-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Tobias Weisserth wrote:
| | The answer depends. The trouble with Fedora are the short release | cycles. There is a legacy project but no experience exists with | that. You can't implement a mission critical environment without | prior knowledge how long this platform will be supported. | This is exactly the problem with fc1 in a production enviroment. The fact that it becomes unsupported so fast, as far as patches are concerned. Aside from this, it's perfectly stable and secure from what I've seen. Things get a little wonky when you try playing with 3d cards, ati most notably, but that's not a concern you'd have working with a server anyway.
Right now, I would recommend against fc1 for servers, due simply to it's release cycle. Granted, it may be quite easy to yum upgrade to fc2, or there may develop a large enough community to keep updating the rpms, but as of now, that all seems vaporous, and definitely not something to base a server off of. The enterprise version of redhat is a good idea in this case.
- -- Sean Kennedy PGP public key: http://tpno.org/keys/0xFC1C377F.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAn8v4IjyA6vwcN38RAvkfAJ919hOYDFHDnRlESV3r/SLrG9DYBwCdGQih FSazmU1RvGZpZ4lWKOse7IU= =s8zd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
