On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 02:34:45PM +1000, Robert Murphy wrote: > Hi. Well, I've just subscribed to this list, and haven't received any > digests yet, but breaking all protocols in such a situation I must ask > the question: what is the story with Fedora RPMs requiring glibc 2.3.4 > ?? I've had to compile a few things against my existing glibc to get a They don't require glibc 2.3.4, they require any glibc that provides some particular @GLIBC_2.3.4 symbols. Fedora includes a glibc CVS snapshot (this is nothing new, all Red Hat/Fedora distributions used CVS snapshots for several years), which provides those @GLIBC_2.3.4 symbols. What's the problem? Jakub
