Re: Config ADSL

[Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

fedora-list wrote:

> Hi Alexander (and anyone that has some insight into this problem),
>
> Thanks for your help so far.
>
> The files:
>
> /etc/hosts
>
> and
>
> /etc/resolv.conf
>
> are configured correctly.
>
> The connection still fails, so I have included my routing table for you to see, if it helps:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> 165.165.128.1__0.0.0.0________255.255.255.255__UH__0__0__0__ppp0
> 192.168.1.0____192.168.1.10___255.255.255.0____UG__0__0__0__eth0
> 192.168.1.0____0.0.0.0________255.255.255.0____U___0__0__0__eth0
> 169.254.0.0____0.0.0.0________255.255.0.0______U___0__0__0__eth0
> 127.0.0.0______0.0.0.0________255.0.0.0________U___0__0__0__lo
> 0.0.0.0________192.168.1.254__0.0.0.0__________UG__0__0__0__eth0
>
> (underscores for legibility purposes ;-P )
>
>  
You have 2 default gateways assigned, and both are on the local LAN
You must remove the default gateways and allow the DSL connection to set 
that up for you.

look in /etc/sysconfig/network and 
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 and remove them



> The ADSL's IP is 192.168.1.254, host machine eth0 static IP is 192.168.1.10.
>
> I've also set ppp0 as a trusted device in firewall setup if that changes anything.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
>
> Stuart
>
>
> On Sat, 01 May 2004 19:52:57 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>
>  
>
> > Am Sa, den 01.05.2004 schrieb fedora-list um 19:17:
> >
> >    
> >
> > > Hi Fedorans.
> > > =20
> > > Hmmm... I need some insight to solve this one.
> > > =20
> > > I've set up a FC1 box to access the web through an ADSL device on a UTP n=
> > >      
> > etwork (ie not USB config).
> >    
> >
> > > =20
> > > I can ping DHCP-assigned IP 165.165.144.130 say.
> > > I can ping P-t-P addr 165.165.128.1 (gateway?) with mask 255.255.255.255
> > >      
> > So the device setup and the routes seem to fit.
> >
> >    
> >
> > > I can't ping DNS 196.25.1.11 say, Ctrl-C shows packet loss.
> > >      
> > That has not to say much. ping is not the almighty tool much people take
> > it for.
> >
> > $ ping 196.25.1.11
> > PING 196.25.1.11 (196.25.1.11) 56(84) bytes of data.
> > =46rom 196.43.11.41 icmp_seq=3D4 Packet filtered
> > =46rom 196.43.11.41 icmp_seq=3D5 Packet filtered
> >
> > You easily see, the filter ICMP.
> >
> >    
> >
> > > I can't ping canonical names www.cnn.com say, Ctrl-C doesn't even report =
> > >      
> > a response.
> >
> > www.cnn.com filters ICMP packages too. So a ping has to show you 100%
> > package loss.
> >
> > =46rom www.mit.edu I get ping replies. So try that target.
> >
> >    
> >
> > > I've added all sorts of combinations and permutations with 'route add', a=
> > >      
> > lack.
> >    
> >
> > > =20
> > > It seems as though the further one moves away from the low level function=
> > >      
> > ality, the less name resolving etc one 'sees'.
> >    
> >
> > > I've this going before, but can't remember how.
> > > I am aware of the naming issue in the 'Internet Connection Wizard', where=
> > >      
> > one has to enter 'ppp0' as the provider name.
> >    
> >
> > > Any insight is appreciated.
> > > =20
> > > Regards,
> > > =20
> > > Stu@
> > >      
> > Check the output of "route", the default route has to point to the ppp
> > device.
> > Check the settings in /etc/resolv.conf to have valid nameserver entries
> > (take the DNS server from your ISP).
> > Check /etc/hosts file to have the line for name resolution for
> > localhost: 127.0.0.1.
> >
> > Alexander
> >
> >
> > --=20
> > Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
> > Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2188.nptl
> > Sirendipity 19:46:43 up 4 days, 18:35, load average: 0.02, 0.11, 0.09=20
> > [ =CE=93=CE=BD=CF=89=CE=B8=CE=B9 =CF=83'=CE=B1=CF=85=CF=
> > =84=CE=BF=CE=BD - gnothi seauton ]
> > my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars
> >    
>
>
>
>
>
>