Re: SCO: GPL not unconstitutional

• To: bowenw@xxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: SCO: GPL not unconstitutional
• From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 21:23:33 -0400
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <409264EC.21188.179EDAA@localhost>
• Organization: Organization: None, detectable by casual observers
• References: <[email protected]> <409264EC.21188.179EDAA@localhost>
• Reply-to: gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KMail/1.6

On Friday 30 April 2004 17:38, William H. Bowen wrote:
Please do not post in html.  When this message is sent, yours will be 
deleted unread.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SCO: GPL not unconstitutional
    • From: Rodolfo J. Paiz

• References:
  • Re: SCO: GPL not unconstitutional
    • From: jludwig
  • Re: SCO: GPL not unconstitutional
    • From: William H. Bowen

• Prev by Date: Xfree86 and KVM
• Next by Date: Re: Connecting to Microsoft VPN
• Previous by thread: Re: SCO: GPL not unconstitutional
• Next by thread: Re: SCO: GPL not unconstitutional
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread