----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Vian" <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 8:21 PM Subject: Re: yum update 2179 kernel > > > John Fleming wrote: > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Eric Diamond" <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >To: "'For users of Fedora Core releases'" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 4:41 PM > >Subject: RE: yum update 2179 kernel > > > > > > > > > >>Monday, April 19, 2004 3:16 PM John Fleming added: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Monday, April 19, 2004 3:10 PM Brian Chase helped with: > >>> > >>> > >>>>... If you've got a day or two to see more posts > >>>>on this for better advice, you would be wise to get them all before > >>>>making any moves. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>Thanks Brian. I can wait. I did run yum update again, but > >>>it just said all packages were up to date (as does up2date!). > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>Sage advice under any circumstances... > >> > >>OK. Two questions: > >> > >>1) You say that yum/rpm/kernel packare is stating that there's no boot > >>loader configured, but yet you get the grub splash screen and kernel > >>choices... What does 'rpm -q grub' output? > >> > >> > > > >grub-0.93-7 > > > > > > > >>AND > >> > >>2) What happens if you run 'rpm -e kernel-2.4.22-1.2179.nptl' and then > >>run 'yum update'? > >> > >> > > > >1. Well, I ran "yum remove kernel-2.4.22-1.2179.nptl" > > > >and got "No Matches for (the above). > > > >2. Then I ran 'rpm -e .....' as above and it returned the console prompt. > > > >3. Then I ran yum update - (I'm just used to using yum). It didn't > >download anything, but said it was installing the kernel. Then the > >aforementioned "no bootloader found" message, then a line that the kernel > >was installed. > > > >4. Rebooted - Got the Grub 0.93 screen with the 2 old kernel choices. > > > >5. Updated, this time with rpm graphical, and it downloaded the kernel - > >Downloaded and installed without errors, and suggested I reboot to use the > >new kernel. > > > >6. The reboot yielded the graphical screen showing Grub 0.93 and STILL THE > >2 OLD KERNEL CHOICES! > > > >7. Still no /boot/grub file, fwiw. > > > >Any help appreciated. - John > > > > > > > I believe you said that /boot/grub does not exist? > This seems weird if grub is actually installed and you are able to boot > with grub. Very weird, but that's the observation: [root@wa9als boot]# ls -a . System.map .. System.map-2.4.22-1.2179.nptl config-2.4.22-1.2179.nptl vmlinux-2.4.22-1.2179.nptl initrd-2.4.22-1.2179.nptl.img vmlinuz kernel.h vmlinuz-2.4.22-1.2179.nptl [root@wa9als boot]# Since my system functions normally except for using 1-older kernel, I'm under no pressure to do anything about this. However, I assume if another kernel is released, the same thing will happen, so I might as well keep trying to figure this out. For some reason, yum and or up2date thought there was no grub installed and thus couldn't put the new kernel choice into grub. I have Webmin, and it has a grub install option - I've considered trying that, but it makes me a little nervous...
