On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 15:40, Mike Bartman wrote: > Fedora seems (correct me if I'm wrong please...) to be a development > system...a continuous beta release. I've always felt that referring to the test releases as "unstable" was a mistake. They're not unstable in the sense of crashing all the time, but unstable in the sense of changing. That being said, Fedora Core 1 has been "stable" (i.e., unchanging, with the exception of patches) for months. -- Ben Steeves _ bcs@xxxxxxxxxx The ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) ben.steeves@xxxxxx against HTML e-mail X GPG ID: 0xB3EBF1D9 http://www.metacon.ca/ascii / \ Yahoo Messenger: ben_steeves
