On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 02:19, ne... wrote: > On Apr 13, 2004 at 11:10, jludwig in a soothing rage wrote: > > >On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 10:56, Etanisla Lopez-Ortiz wrote: > > [...] > >> 7: "make dep" > >> 8: "make clean" > >> 9: "make bzImage" > I would generally do a 'make dep clean bzImage modules'. > If any one of the options abends, the whole thing stops > there. > > >> 10: "cp /arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/vmlinuz-x.x.x" > >> 11: "ln -s /boot/vmlinuz-x.x.x /boot/vmlinuz-x.x.x-new-kernel" > 10 & 11 are not needed if you do 'make install'. > > >> 12: "make modules" > >> 13: "make modules_install" > >> 14: "make install" > >> 15: Edit /etc/rc.sysinit and change '/proc/sys/kernel/modprobe' to > >> /sbin/modprobe'. > >> 16: "shutdown -r now" > >> 17: After rebooting, and selecting new kernel option, type "uname -r" to > >> verify the new kernel is running. > >> > >> So, whaddya think? > >> --Etanisla > > > >You'll have to do a mkinitrd image kernel-version or at least in the > >grub.config change the label to /dev/hdxx so the kernel can find init. > The 'make install' should take care of the initrd image. > > N.Emile... > -- > Registered Linux User # 125653 (http://counter.li.org) > Switch to: http://www.speakeasy.net/refer/190653 > Raffiniert ist der Herrgott aber boshaft ist er nicht. > -- Albert Einstein > 12:15:25 up 24 days, 47 min, 5 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 Hi all, Where would a "make rpm" target fit into these steps? I would think these kernel compilation steps should include this should it not? Wouldn't it be cleaner and more manageable to create an RPM out of this process? Regards, -Matt -- mhelios - www.fedoraforum.org Registered Linux User #348963 / counter.li.org GnuPG KeyID: 0xCE9F8922 / gnupg.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
