Re: RH rips again Was: extend EOL for Red Hat Linux 9?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 14:02 4/12/2004, you wrote:

The point was that for those who paid for RH9 service that moving to RHWS isn't truly an upgrade if you're using any of the missing features.

The original poster (Guy Fraser) said he got "ripped off" because RH discontinued 9. I said that he would have an OS available for the life of his subscription, and that (despite having notified of the EOL previously) RH had attempted to compensate him for said EOL by providing access (for no additional cost) to an OS which *they* perceive to be better than what he had before since it has an EOL approximately in 2008.


Whether you or I see it as an upgrade is *not* the point. Guy said he got ripped off, I say he didn't... he got something of value throughout the life of his subscription.


-- Rodolfo J. Paiz rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.simpaticus.com



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux