Satish Balay said: > >> On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 12:11, William Hooper wrote: > >> > As others have suggested: >> > Installing everything isn't a good starting point >> > Yum is a more reliable after packages have been upgraded from their >> > original version. > > Not necessarily. You can: > > - modify the source list - to modify yum behavior (if you don't want > to work with certain repositories - like updates) > > - use local/cache-only mode - where it doesn't try to sync to the > latest .hdr database. So you agree that yum is better than r-c-p after packages have been upgraded? -- William Hooper
