On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 10:47:32PM +0000, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: > It would appear that on Apr 5, duncan brown did say: > > > has probably changed, but from what i remember pine and pico (come in the > > same tar) are extremely difficult to compile. It is easy to compile.... > of it it is at least, free to use... I don't know about source tarballs, > (I doubt I'd even attempt to compile it) Download it and give the README a look, it is easy to compile and install. I am a fan of pine and pico. I love how it uses lyx/lynx to present html postings. Since there is a binary package for windows it gets easy to use the same mail tool (pine) at any desktop your company hands you. By it's text nature it is a safer mailer than most but has it's issues. I see one of you used Pine.LNX.4.50. Please upgrade to Pine 4.58: This new version fixes a major security vulnerability. -- T o m M i t c h e l l /dev/null the ultimate in secure storage.
