On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Am So, den 04.04.2004 schrieb James Ralston um 11:38: > > > On 2004-04-03 at 03:12:02+0200 Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > http://fedoralegacy.org/ > > > I _think_ they will also do RH9. > > > > Personally, I don't think this is necessary; just a month or so of > > overlapping support for both RHL9 and FC2 should be sufficient. > > > BTW: I was wrong. As far as I know there are no plans at fedoralegacy to > take over RH9. Look at the FL mailing list archives. I think you will see that this time you are wrong. The bottom line is FL will maintain whatever there is manpower available to maintain. For sure there are people interested in RHL9. It remains to be seen if there are enough people willing to actually do the work. I suspect there will be but you never know for sure until it is actually time to do it. HTH, Tom
