Re: RPM i386 vs i686 performance (Michal Zeravik)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




rpmbuild --rebuild [--target=..] packg.src.rpm

will do all of those steps in one hit also.

Cheers,
Daniel.


On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 16:26:18 +0100, Michal Zeravik <michalz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Rebuilding package from src.rpm is very simple:
1. rpm -i packg.src.rpm
[2. edit /usr/src/redhat/SPEC/packg.spec]
3. rpmbuild -bb /usr/src/redhat/SPEC/packg.spec [--clean]
[--target=athlon e.g.]
4. rpm -Uvh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/athlon/packg.rpm
Done.

michalz


Michele Schiavo wrote:

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:16:27 +0100
From: Michal Zeravik <michalz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RPM i386 vs i686 performance


To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <406070EB.60909@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Chris and others,
I can't measure window desktop response time,
but It seems to be faster than original packages.
I'm sorry, I know this is subjective.
But graphical desktop seems run faster on my athlon-xp
when I've rebuild X and KDE.
Also memory consuming is much fewer with rebuilded custom kernel
than original (or atrpms) one.
System is more fresh I think.
But I have no numbers, sorry. Give it a try ...

michal



It's too difficult rebuild X from SRPM ? Can you write something ? So i'll try

Thank's Michele Schiavo










-- email:snorri_dj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://members.optusnet.com.au/stonierd/



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux