Am So, den 21.03.2004 schrieb Greg Ennis um 22:16: > Anyone, > > Would you please point me in the right direction as to whether yum or up2date should > be used for FC1. I have looked in the archives and have not been able to figure out > the pros and cons of each. I presume that up2date downloads from RedHat and yum from > one of the FC1 mirror sites. I never had any difficulty using up2date on RH 7.1 and > 8.0 systems, but using it on FC1 is difficult because it stops about every third file > that is downloaded. > > Sure would appreciate some information about the differences between these. > > Thanks, > > Greg Ennis That has been discussed here before, also on fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxxx You can use both. See http://fedoranews.org/contributors/alexander_dalloz/mirror/ for setup instructions. It shows you that both tools can use the same repositories. Alexander P.S. Please do not hijack foreign threads. Start new topic with an empty mail editor window. -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2174.nptl Sirendipity 22:21:27 up 2 days, 7:03, load average: 0.13, 0.21, 0.20 [ ÎÎÏÎÎ Ï'ÎÏÏÎÎ - gnothi seauton ] my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
