RE: Hard Lock with Fedora Core 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Norman,

Thanks for all your help.  I tried again with your settings, but it still
hard locks.  I also tried running a memory testing program (memtest86),
which you boot directly into and that hard locks too.  I'm guessing it's
either a bad CPU or a bad motherboard.

<> Jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-list-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Small, Jim
> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 10:39 AM
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> Subject: RE: Hard Lock with Fedora Core 1
> 
> I tried the sysreq=1 and nmi_watchdog=1 settings.  I also hooked up a
> serial
> cable to Com1.  I even setup agetty to watch Com1 and logged in to make
> sure
> that the connection is good.
> 
> However, when the system locks, alt-printscreen-p doesn't do anything and
> I
> don't see any output on the serial port.
> 
> Am I doing something wrong?  Is there anything else I can try?
> 
> <> Jim
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-list-
> > bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Small, Jim
> > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 7:34 PM
> > To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> > Subject: RE: Hard Lock with Fedora Core 1
> >
> > Norman,
> >
> > Thank you for the configuration settings.  I will try those tomorrow.
> >
> > Funny that BSD/OS ran for so long without hard locks.  Since Linux is
> > aggressive in using memory, I was thinking it could be a memory (RAM)
> > issue.
> > So I am running memtest86 3.1 overnight on the machine to grill the RAM.
> > If
> > there are no memory errors detected I'll try those settings tomorrow.
> >
> > I have a console cable.  I'm assuming I just connect it to Com1 and
> watch?
> > I'll try it tomorrow.  I use console cables all the time for network
> > devices
> > and Suns, but not much for x86 boxes (which this is).
> >
> > On the one hand this is frustrating, but on the other, that's how you
> > learn,
> > right?!?
> >
> > Thanks again,
> >    <> Jim
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 06:53:38PM -0500, Small, Jim wrote:
> > > > I've tried only using one NIC that doesn't share any IRQs (no
> bridging
> > > or
> > > > shared interrupts).  Like I said, this box ran for months without
> > > locking
> > > > running BSD/OS.  What could be causing it to hard lock?
> > > >
> > > > Is there some kernel option I can use to help debug the problem?
> Are
> > > there
> > > > any troublesome modules I should eliminate?
> > >
> > > You could try enabling the sysreq key. That is, in /etc/sysctl.conf,
> > > set this:
> > >
> > > # Controls the System Request debugging functionality of the kernel
> > > kernel.sysrq = 1
> > >
> > > then run "sysctl -p"
> > >
> > > Then, when the system hangs, on the console hit 'alt-prntscrn-P' to
> > > see where the processors are locked. alt-prntscrn-H will show you
> other
> > > commands you might want to try. A serial console is needed to collect
> > > or view all the output.
> > >
> > > Setting NMI watchdog could also be helpful. Do that by putting
> > > "nmi_watchdog=1" in the options of the kernel line in grub.conf.
> > > The system should oops if it locks up.
> >
> >
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux