Valid GPG Sig's on update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Valid GPG Sig's on update
From: Jay Scherrer <jay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:55:51 -0800
Reply-to: Jay@xxxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.5.4

Can we trust the files with corrupted GPG sig's while using up2date?
I've succesfully installed Fedora core 1, but when I try the up2date manager, 
I get notices that the GPG sig has been tampered with or that it has been 
corrupted. Can we trust the connection?

Jay

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Valid GPG Sig's on update
  - From: Tom Needs a Hat Mitchell
- Re: Valid GPG Sig's on update
  - From: Roger Beever

Prev by Date: Re: ALSA!
Next by Date: Re: How to acces Windows files
Previous by thread: How to acces Windows files
Next by thread: Re: Valid GPG Sig's on update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux