On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 00:16, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am Mo, den 15.03.2004 schrieb Chadley Wilson um 22:53: > > > > > > http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/1057995/com/qt-3.2.3-0.2.i386.rpm.html > > The package above is QT from FC 1.90. > > Do you believe qt-3.2.3 / qt-devel-3.2.3 will provide QT version 1.4? > Why do you think so? > Well it hasnt anything to do with belief, more hope I cant seem to find an rpm for qt1.4 and was hoping for backward compatibility! Thats all Chad > I have not much experience with QT but I am fairly sure QT 3.2 is way > different from QT 1.4. Thus even creating a symlink "faking" you have QT > 1.4 libraries and headers, while the symlink points to the QT 3.2 > libs/headers, will probably fail. > > Imagine, taking an application for Windows 3.11 and trying to install > that on Windows XP, in very many cases this will fail. The application > expects specific dlls and up to XP they have changed a lot. > > If you really want to go on with that bloody QT 1.4, do a google > research for the QT 1.4 source and try to compile that source. With very > much luck that will succeed and you can install these headers/libs in > parallel to the actual FC1 headers/libs. But perhaps the compilation > will fail as the compiler changed too from the one in 1998. > > I hope you understand what I am trying to explain. > > > Thanks > > Chad > > Alexander > > > -- > Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 > Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2174.nptl > Sirendipity 23:04:57 up 6 days, 23:24, load average: 0.33, 0.27, 0.20 > [ Î?νÏ?θι Ï?'αÏ?Ï?ον - gnothi seauton ] > my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars > >
