Well I found one way to get around it for now =) route del -net 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth0 Thank you again for your help On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 18:43, Chris Miller wrote: > Hi, > > > I seem to have a problem with the network scripts. If I have ifcfg-eth0 > , ifcfg-eth0:100 and ifcfg-eth0:243. When the interfaces are uped if > you do a netstat -nr I will have 3 default gateways all being the > gateway in ifcfg-eth0. Ifcfg-eth0:100 and ifcfg-eth0:243 do not have > gateways but yet they get added as the one in ifcfg-eth0. Even if > ifcfg-eth0 is in a different network. Is that right? I have never seen > that work that way before. Under redhat if you don't set a gateway in > the ifcfg script then it will not add one. I do that to send traffic > from the box out different gateways. > > > > > Thank You for any help > Chris Miller > cmiller@xxxxxxxxxx >
