-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 07 Mar 2004 19:00, Jef Spaleta wrote: > Gavin Henry wrote: > > Just visit: > > http://fedoranews.org/ghenry/swatch > > And at the URL, you say its "been submitted to the Fedora Core FC2", > but you post a link to fedora.us bugzilla. This is a very confusing > and misleading use of inherently confusing and misleading terminology. > As of now as far as i know, fedora.us is still a separate entity. And > even if fedora.us does get merged into the Red Hat sponsored Fedora > Project in the FC2 release timeline (miracles do happen), at best the > packages published at fedora.us in the meantime are going to fill Fedora > Extras, and certaintly not land directly into "Official Fedora Core". > Perhaps > its best not to suggest that these rpms are going to find their way into > the official install media images of Fedora Core, and say Fedora Extras, > which would be a more accurate lie. Ok, ok, I will change that statement. :-) - -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. http://www.magicfx.co.uk http://FedoraNEWS.ORG/ghenry http://www.suretecsystems.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAS4h+gNqd7Kng8UoRAvVxAJ43IkUBax6sp58RgaPaOvgIq3chtACgrYnw CPp4ZsBmVCmVIigfDvLOL+4= =BLTx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
