On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 08:02:56PM +0100, Tim Kossack wrote: > Am Fr, den 27.02.2004 schrieb Axel Thimm um 00:52: > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 10:44:25PM +0100, Tim Kossack wrote: > > > i installed the yum.conf from atrpms a few days, but some of the > > > provided links didn't work, so i edited the list by hand. > > > > Could you give some more details? Was it the change with the spc repo > > or something else? Thanks! > > yes - also, i wanted to have testing packages - see my yum.conf below! > (btw, if you don't already, it would be nice if you or someone else > could make a yum.conf with all comp./needed reps. and _all_ their > mirrors, so that one doesn't have to go mirror/rep.-hunting every week! (Better) organization of repositories is underway and mirror lists are part of it. > also, what about an rpm that would also update up2date conf.? i like > using both ;-) Also on the TODO list, but there is quite a lot before it. :( > > yum is a bit too strict with the repos' old/new contents, because it > > shades old versions of the same rpm away, so that at the end it does not find the > > dependencies to these (old) rpms. > > > It's a bug and a feature of yum, it forces repos to keep in sync with > > the latest released packages ;) > > so does that mean that currently the needed package isn't avaible, and i > just have to wait until gimp-plugin for gimp 2.0 gets released? means, > do i have to change my yum.conf? I think you need to use something else besides yum, try up2date, apt or rcd. > [at-production] > name=ATrpms for Fedora Core 1 production > baseurl=http://spc.atrpms.net/fedora/linux/1/i386/production/ > > [at-testing] > name=ATrpms for Fedora Core 1 testing > baseurl=http://spc.atrpms.net/fedora/linux/1/i386/testing/ Oops, you are pointing to spc repo here (which you also have further below), not the atrpms' repos. -- Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpDtDqzjLHpU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
