Re: FC1 as a server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: FC1 as a server
From: "Bevan C. Bennett" <bevan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:35:39 -0800
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20031114

Fredrik Holmberg wrote:

What are your experiences on running Fedora (Core 1) as a server, in comparison to the former Red Hat 9 (Shrike)?

I never installed a RH9 server. My desktop experiences with FC1 have been much much better than with RH9, however. Many more things 'just work' like they are supposed to.

As far as FC1 servers go... 3 LDAP/SMB/DNS/DHCP servers: up 45 days with no unscheduled reboots 1 postfix/spamd/cyrus IMAP server: up 45 days with no unscheduled reboots (need to add clamav) 8 SMP compute servers: 7 up 30 days, 2 hung by application 4 days ago

References:
- FC1 as a server
  - From: Fredrik Holmberg

Prev by Date: Re: CD Writing Hostile-Takeover
Next by Date: Re: WLAN EMERGENCY!!!!
Previous by thread: Re: FC1 as a server
Next by thread: Re: FC1 as a server
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux