Re: FC1 as a server but NOT HP Proliant

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,
It's working but ...
If it's a critical production environment, and if you plan to contract support whith HP, forget it !
I do have a problem with a G3 server which crash after 2 weeks in production mode.
Since I have an other G3 as office server which run perfectly, I'm quite sure that it's a hardware problem, and I have standard 3 years garanty from HP.
So I called them, and I have been told that they don't care about my problem because of FC1 !!!!!!!!
They just told me to install RH8 which is the last "open" release supported, or to by RedHat ES3 !.
Not really what I expected from such a company ! ( why do not install WFW3.11 ??? )


If somebody has an other feed back HP, please let me know !
Regards.
Gaetan Yavorsky.


Michael Gargiullo a écrit :

On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 08:25, Fredrik Holmberg wrote:


What are your experiences on running Fedora (Core 1) as a server, in comparison to the former Red Hat 9 (Shrike)?

--
Regards,
Fredrik Holmberg




We actually use it in several dozen servers without incident. We maybe the exception though. We also run the SMP kernel without a problem. We have it running on dual AMD systems, Dual Intel, and Dual Intel Xeon boxes. We did have one boot problem on the dual xeon box, but we have it running on one of the mail gateways, and it handles everything nicely.









[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux