>>> jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx 02/23/04 08:14PM >>> >Is there an eth0 defined?? Yup, see my other reply. >I can think of another time where this might be of concern. I usually >think of eth0:0 as equivalent to the base device eth0 and thus begin my >aliases as eth0:1. I do not know if this is required, but maybe someone >can answer that. The first time I tried was with an eth0:1. I was afraid the problem was that I skipped 0 so the next time I tried eth0:0. Same results. Thanks for the reply Paul
