On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Mark wrote: > On February 20, 2004 12:31 am, Preston wrote: > > El Jueves, 19 de Febrero de 2004 06:04 PM, Alexandre Strube escribió: > > > Em Qua, 2004-02-18 às 18:17, Mark escreveu: > > > > Incidently enough the FireGL drivers don't support anything under r200 > > > > so you would have to run the DRI driver for anything less than a Radeon > > > > 8500. > > > > > > All these models are confusing me. > > > > > > Anyway, what card is good enough to play ut2004 and that has the drivers > > > already on fedora, so we don't need to get them from ATI or NVidia site? > > > > None. The closer match is nvidia+official drivers. > > Play or Play well. I can play ut2004 without 3D acceleration, it just really > sucks. With 3D support on, it's pretty unplayable with all the artifacting my > Radeon throws at the screen. unreal has allways placed kind of excessive hardware specific demands on systems... the first unreal game was what motivated me to replace my ati mach64/matrox-m3d combo with a 3dfx voodo2. even today if you want play the game you get to pay the piper... one would think that given the advances in graphics hardware that we could design game engines that could be coaxed into supporting a relativy broad range of modern hardware/accelerator implementations well... but you still find the major game franchise vendors telling you which new wazzu piece of hardware you're going to need to enjoy it. > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joel Jaeggli Unix Consulting joelja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx GPG Key Fingerprint: 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2