Re: Radeon Card Supported by Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Mark wrote:

> On February 20, 2004 12:31 am, Preston wrote:
> > El Jueves, 19 de Febrero de 2004 06:04 PM, Alexandre Strube escribió:
> > > Em Qua, 2004-02-18 às 18:17, Mark escreveu:
> > > > Incidently enough the FireGL drivers don't support anything under r200
> > > > so you would have to run the DRI driver for anything less than a Radeon
> > > > 8500.
> > >
> > > All these models are confusing me.
> > >
> > > Anyway, what card is good enough to play ut2004 and that has the drivers
> > > already on fedora, so we don't need to get them from ATI or NVidia site?
> >
> > None. The closer match is nvidia+official drivers.
> 
> Play or Play well. I can play ut2004 without 3D acceleration, it just really 
> sucks. With 3D support on, it's pretty unplayable with all the artifacting my 
> Radeon throws at the screen.

unreal has allways placed kind of excessive hardware specific demands on
systems... the first unreal game was what motivated me to replace my ati
mach64/matrox-m3d combo with a 3dfx voodo2. even today if you want play
the game you get to pay the piper... one would think that given the
advances in graphics hardware that we could design game engines that could
be coaxed into supporting a relativy broad range of modern
hardware/accelerator implementations well... but you still find the major
game franchise vendors telling you which new wazzu piece of hardware
you're going to need to enjoy it.
 
> 
> 

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Joel Jaeggli  	       Unix Consulting 	       joelja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    
GPG Key Fingerprint:     5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2





[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux