I guess if I were to have checked to see that the fedora update site had changed I would not have had these problems with up2date. And, yes, I am using up2date with fedora - and when the URL is correct it works much better. I have not tried yum. I like the little icon in the lower right corner with up2date - is there something similar with yum or is it just command line? DF On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 12:53, Harry Hoffman wrote: > Do you mean the Redhat up2date service (ala rhn.redhat.com)? Cause I'm not > seeing that behavior at all. I'm using RH9 and everything works as expected (or > at least as I expect it to). > Or do you mean you're running Fedora and trying to use up2date? If so, don't do > that! :-) Try "yum" with Fedora. > > HTH, > harry > > Quoting redhat <redhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > *> Is it just me or is up2date kind of sucking pretty bad these days? It > *> seems like many of the packages are unsigned and if you are not watching > *> the progress of each package it just stops with a pop up message. What > *> ever happened to Red Hat's online service that enabled users to maintain > *> servers through a browser? I actually paid for a couple of my servers > *> to be part of that and really liked it. Is there anything like that > *> with Fedora? Just curious. BTW, I am having to load individual > *> packages with up2date to get it to work correctly. Maybe the server is > *> overloaded? > *> DF > *> > *> > *> -- > *> fedora-list mailing list > *> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > *> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > *> > > > -- > Harry Hoffman > hhoffman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > ------------------------------------------------- > This mail sent through IpSolutions: http://www.ip-solutions.net/ >
