Re: Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?
From: Gregory Woodbury <ggw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 00:25:20 -0500
In-reply-to: <1077052707.27781.7.camel@scorpio>
References: <[email protected]> <1077052707.27781.7.camel@scorpio>
Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 09:18:27PM +0000, David Keen wrote:
 
> After stopping rhnsd, these errors disappeared.  (I use up2date, rather
> than yum, btw).

Just FYI, up2date is now a front-end to yum!

-- 
Gregory G. "Wolfe" Woodbury      `-_-'    Owner/Admin: wolves.durham.nc.us
ggw at wolves.durham.nc.us         U     RHCT August 2003
"The Line Eater is a boojum snark."     Hug your wolf.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?
  - From: Bill Nottingham

References:
- Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?
  - From: Clint Harshaw
- Re: Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?
  - From: David Keen

Prev by Date: Re: lvm is needed by (installed) mkinitrd-3.5.14-1
Next by Date: Re: S3 Prosavage PN133 Video issue during installation
Previous by thread: Re: Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?
Next by thread: Re: Is rhnsd necessary if we're using yum for updates?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux