kaze kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika perjantai, 13. helmikuuta 2004 23:53): > [root@ImediaArchive root]# rpm -qi samba-swat-3.0.0-15.i386.rpm > package samba-swat-3.0.0-15.i386.rpm is not installed "rpm -q" and "rpm -e" take a _package_ name as their parameter, not a _file_ name. In this case, the package is called samba-swat and you should try "rpm -qi samba-swat" instead. > Anyway there now is a /etc/xinetd.d/swat, so I went in there > and changed the disabled to "no" > > Question: is inetd.d the same as xinetd.d? xinetd is used for the same purpose but it's net the same program and they use different configuration files. > In /etc/xinetd.conf I added: "swat stream tcp nowait.400 root > /usr/local/samba/bin/swat swat" but vi highlights the three > words swat in yellow.. That's inetd syntax, and it's guaranteed to break xinetd. See /var/log/messages for the error messages. -- Markku Kolkka markku.kolkka@xxxxxx
