Re: What's a good WM for a DX4-100 w/ 16Mb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: What's a good WM for a DX4-100 w/ 16Mb
From: Juan Lupión <jlupion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:43:38 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.6

On Thursday 12 February 2004 06:46, Aaron Matteson wrote:
> I would highly recommend WindowMaker, though Afterstep, Blackbox are
> pretty slick too on low-power systems.

I would go for IceWM or "classic" afterstep (is it still available?).

References:
- Re: What's a good WM for a DX4-100 w/ 16Mb
  - From: Bevan C. Bennett
- Re: What's a good WM for a DX4-100 w/ 16Mb
  - From: Andre Costa
- Re: What's a good WM for a DX4-100 w/ 16Mb
  - From: Aaron Matteson

Prev by Date: Re: FC2 test 1
Next by Date: Re: gdm fonts are unreadably small
Previous by thread: Re: What's a good WM for a DX4-100 w/ 16Mb
Next by thread: Re: What's a good WM for a DX4-100 w/ 16Mb
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux