Re: What's a good WM for a DX4-100 w/ 16Mb

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: What's a good WM for a DX4-100 w/ 16Mb
• From: Juan Lupión <jlupion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:43:38 +0100
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
• User-agent: KMail/1.6

On Thursday 12 February 2004 06:46, Aaron Matteson wrote:
> I would highly recommend WindowMaker, though Afterstep, Blackbox are
> pretty slick too on low-power systems.

I would go for IceWM or "classic" afterstep (is it still available?). 

• References:
  • Re: What's a good WM for a DX4-100 w/ 16Mb
    • From: Bevan C. Bennett
  • Re: What's a good WM for a DX4-100 w/ 16Mb
    • From: Andre Costa
  • Re: What's a good WM for a DX4-100 w/ 16Mb
    • From: Aaron Matteson

• Prev by Date: Re: FC2 test 1
• Next by Date: Re: gdm fonts are unreadably small
• Previous by thread: Re: What's a good WM for a DX4-100 w/ 16Mb
• Next by thread: Re: What's a good WM for a DX4-100 w/ 16Mb
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread