On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 11:46, Brian Johnson wrote: > No idea why they chose ephinany or firebird or mozilla, but running firebird, > ephinany and galeon on the same url showed only a 2MB difference in the memory > they used (the lowest was epiphany at 18MB). > > IM, that extra 2MB is justified by galeon with it's numerous additional > features. Not to continue picking on Mozilla|Firebird|Epiphany, but Galeon's session handling is just _so_ much better. I've tried the various Moz extensions. They either a) don't work, b) don't work well, or c) conflict with other tab extensions. Galeon just works. -- Jason Dixon, RHCE DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net
