Re: yum vs. apt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David L Norris wrote:
YUM Advantages:
  Better mirror and failover support.
  Supports multilib on dual 32-bit/64-bit systems (x86_64, PPC?, etc)
  (My opinion: YUM repositories are much easier to create on demand.)

Let's add:
Cache can be shared between multiple machines to conserve bandwidth. I've got /var/yum/cache nfs mounted to a central server for all of my yum'd boxes. For a local network, this saves internet bandwidth, at the cost of some update speed. But at 4am, who cares? :-)


YUM Disadvantages:
  Wastes considerable bandwidth downloading header (.hdr) files.

Which is why the central shared repository is great for multiple local machines. For similar configs, headers are only grabbed once.


APT Advantages:
  Can remove entire trees of interdependent packages.

So can yum. Try yum remove httpd (don't say yes) as an experiment.

-Rick
--
Rick Johnson, RHCE #807302311706007 - rjohnson@xxxxxxxxxx
Linux/Network Administrator - Medata, Inc.
PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/rjohnson.asc




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux