Am Fr, den 06.02.2004 schrieb Gerhard Wiesinger um 14:39: > On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Alexander Appel wrote: > > > Am Do, den 05.02.2004 schrieb Alexander Apprich um 13:37: > > > > > Have you checked the load of the server who stores the 100 MB file? > > > From my own experience it could be just a weak smbd process. Have > > > you tried to kill all smbd processes on your server? Also, check > > > with top (then shift+p fuer sort by CPU usage) if the system is okay. > > > > I didn't find any unusual processes or any process producing heavy load. > > I tried restarting the server but it didn't change the strange > > behaviour. > > > > I'm having the same problem. > > Have a look at the samba technical mailing list. > http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2004-January/033899.html > http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2004-January/033901.html > http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2004-January/033902.html > http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2004-January/033903.html > > Do you have the same problems? > > As far as Richard Sharpe (samba and ethereal developer) helped me we > traced it down that this must be a Linux TCP kernel bug with Fedora. > > It depends also on the acpi/apmd settings of the kernel. > > Also a strange behaviour: > When sniffing with ethereal on the linux machine and looking at the trace > with X11 remotly from the Windows machine (update packets in real time), > performance is ok!!!!! > > Which mainboard and network adapter do you use? > > Also putty looses ssh connections. > > Ciao, > Gerhard I finally found the source of the problem.. when I removed the LG network-card from the slow server and replaced it with another one from Planet everything worked well. Thanks for your help everyone! -- Alexander Appel Egelseestr. 56, D-96050 Bamberg Tel.: +49(951)2999759 - Mobil: +49(172)8220208
